 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Benji New Member
Joined: 06 Jul 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:40 am Post subject: Axis M1031-W camera |
|
|
Hi All!
After having done some research, I have found out that the Axis M1031-W is the camera which lives best up to my requirements.
I am therefore now thinking of purchasing one of these cameras, but first I would like to know more about this camera...
Unfortunately I don't know anybody with such a camera, so I was wondering if anyone out there would like to come with some inputs for me, on the functionality, quality, dependability (picture dropping out) and the price of the camera??!!
It can also be both negative and positive experiences!
Thanks for now,
Benji
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobby1471 Expert
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 109 Location: Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This camera is the most feature filled of the M10 series by axis. It has Wireless, Motion triggered light, 2 way sound functions, and a few other minor features.
My experience with this camera is, unless your planning on being in a very dark area such as a garage or an office after hours, save yourself a little money and go with the M1011w. It has the same functions except the audio, and the light for low light situations. _________________ www.controlbynet.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Benji New Member
Joined: 06 Jul 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:07 am Post subject: quality? |
|
|
How about the quality? I have read that if the camera senses any movement in front of the camera, then it would begin to record?!
But is it reliable? Can I trust that there aren't any "gaps" inbetween the recordments??
I have also read that you can get alarm notification through emails and sms, have you tried these services? does it work?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timhillone Enthusiast
Joined: 08 Dec 2008 Posts: 253
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
This ip camera is H264 encoder! video will be more clearly. H264 WebCam 3.55 can support this ip camera with stream mode. _________________ H264WebCam 3.8 can record video and audio stream from many network ip camera. Support motion detection,broadcast on internet.
Timhillone Software --- http://www.h264soft.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
40th Floor Junky
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 197 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This new m10 fw5 axis camera has one thing I've not seen before, HUGE data sizes for noisy images. 15 Mbits per second is not unsual, in any encode format (mpeg4-10, mpeg4-2, mjpeg). It needs a LOT of light to get a clean image, and without a clean picture mpeg4 encoding is no better than jpeg. You read that right. To get acceptable size data for noisy image data you have to crank up the compression to 90%. If you have the light, or can supply the bandwidth, it's not bad. It's 5.00 fw so it's got bugs.
Right now, in a not-that-dark room, 8 Mbps at 25 fps 640x480, compression set to 50% (mpeg4-2). mpeg4-10 , aka h.264, is even more at 9 Mbps (everything else the same as far as settings go). Motion-jpeg is 10.5 Mbps.
The darker it gets, the more bandwidth. The older fw4 axis 207 line didn't need so much bandwdith. Maybe later firmware will get things down into the 2 Mbps range. This thing is more like the 207mw (the 1280x1024 version) with regard to low-light image quality (i.e., not very good, but not as bad as the mw). It's not terrible, but like I said, noisy gets you HUGE data sizes.
The audio quality is again superb, just like the 207 line. It uses almost twice the power as the 207w did, at 7.5W. I think much of that is in the CPU, which is, I'd wildly guess, about 2 (perhap 3 or more) times faster than the processor in the 207.
By the way, the LED light does help a little, and the audio is the best I've heard (and it's two-way). To me that's worth the extra cost.
As far as I can tell, the thing is fixed-focus. The 207 lines you had to focus manually, and it was very easy to break the lens holder when doing it. _________________ 40th Floor - Software @ http://40th.com/
CastleKeeper - IP camera surveillance/recorder
http://castlekeeper.40th.com/ck2plus_demo.zip
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
40th Floor Junky
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 197 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not quite twice as fast, not in MHz anyway,
The 1031 CPU (probably at 238 MHz)
| Code: |
[root@axism1031w /proc]1485# cat cpuinfo
Processor : ARM926EJ-S rev 5 (v5l)
BogoMIPS : 112.23 probably 238 MHz
Features : swp half fastmult edsp java
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 5TEJ
CPU variant : 0x0
CPU part : 0x926
CPU revision : 5
Cache type : write-back
Cache clean : cp15 c7 ops
Cache lockdown : format C
Cache format : Harvard
I size : 8192
I assoc : 4
I line length : 32
I sets : 64
D size : 8192
D assoc : 4
D line length : 32
D sets : 64
Hardware : Argus
Revision : 0000
Serial : 0000000000000000
|
and 207mw CPU (maybe 148 MHz)
| Code: |
[root@axis207mw /proc]699# cat cpuinfo
Processor : ARM/ANOTO CT200(wt)sid rev 0 (v4l)
BogoMIPS : 74.75
Features : swp half
CPU implementer : 0x43
CPU architecture: 4T
CPU variant : 0x0
CPU part : 0x300
CPU revision : 0
Cache type : write-through
Cache clean : not required
Cache lockdown : not supported
Cache format : Harvard
I size : 2048
I assoc : 1
I line length : 16
I sets : 128
D size : 2048
D assoc : 1
D line length : 16
D sets : 128
Hardware : Argus
Revision : 0000
Serial : 0000000000000000
|
But that's not the whole story. Using top, I notice the CPU use is minimal on the 207mw, at 1280x720 (10 fps) and 640x360 (21 fps), at
207mw : top
| Code: |
PID USER STATUS RSS PPID %CPU %MEM COMMAND
251 root S < 480 1 9.7 2.3 saudiod
313 root S < 984 1 8.0 4.8 media_server
709 root R 316 699 4.3 1.5 top
|
while the newer 1031
| Code: | | 1031 : top (not shown) |
is huffing near the 50% mark, and running a dozen or so instances of the "monolith" process. This is for any encoding format: mjpeg, mpeg4-2, mpeg4-10 (which is probably off-loaded?). I think the difference is the software -- it is much more optimized on the 207 line. The CPU on the old 207 has a write-through cache (sloooow writes to memory) and 2/2K I/D cache at that. Compared that to the 1031 with write-back cache (very fast memory writes): 8/8 KB I/D cache. The faster CPU gives way to sloppy (hence, cheaper) software. Sounds familiar. Faster hardware, slower software, no net gain (or a loss in this case). _________________ 40th Floor - Software @ http://40th.com/
CastleKeeper - IP camera surveillance/recorder
http://castlekeeper.40th.com/ck2plus_demo.zip
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Highest Rated
Most Viewed
|